The Writer's Life
 |
| Photo by Kristen Dacy Iwai |
The Tumbling Turner Sisters (read my review below) by Juliette Fay is
about a poverty-stricken family and how four sisters form a vaudeville
acrobatic act in 1919. Fay's novel was inspired by her great-grandfather, Fred
Delorme, who, in order to support his own family, found success in small-time
vaudeville shows and revues. Fay is the oldest of three sisters. "We are
quite a pack!" she says. "And while none of us is especially like any
of the Turner girls, I felt very comfortable writing about the sibling dynamic,
and I have my own wonderful sisters to thank for that." Fay's three priorworks of contemporary women's fiction have earned awards and recognition from
the Massachusetts Center for the Book, the American Booksellers Association,
the American Library Association, Good Housekeeping, Target's Bookmarked Club and Library
Journal.
Why write this book now?
I was coming up blank on ideas for contemporary fiction when I was reminded of
my great-grandfather and his vaudeville career. I overcame my reservations and
dove in. I always wanted to try historical fiction because I enjoy reading it
so much. It's a wonderful way to learn about another time while enjoying the
entertainment of a good story. I was hesitant to take it on, though, because I
didn't feel "qualified," as if I needed a Ph.D. in some little-known
era to be allowed to write about it. Even when I got over that, I was
intimidated by the steep learning curve of doing so much research and
communicating it in a natural way over the course of the story.
Any major challenges in the writing process?
Two: getting the history right and getting the voices right. There's so much
about writing in another time period that's tricky. You don't know how people
talked to one another, what phrases or tone they might have used--or not
used!--that would be different from today. You don't always know what had been
invented. I wanted to write a scene in which the girls were listening to the
radio, and I knew radios had been invented, but I had to do more research to
learn that there were no public broadcasts until 1920, the year after the story
takes place! I felt like with every sentence I wrote, I needed to look
something up.
Did anything stand out or surprise you in your research?
Vaudeville itself was a subculture based mostly on merit. If you were talented
and successful, your gender, skin color and ethnic origin didn't matter nearly
as much. What kept coming back to me was that vaudeville, in many ways, was a
culture of outsiders. Middle- and upper-class Americans looked down their noses
at performing, which was considered sketchy work. So it was left mainly to the
poor, immigrants and minorities, and women--none of whom had many other options
to rise above their station in life. It was a way for them to beat the system
which, at the time, offered up a pretty heavy slice of oppression.
The vaudeville era spanned from the 1880s to the 1920s. Why did you choose
to set the story in 1919?
Socio-politically there was so much going on in 1919--the passage of
prohibition and women's suffrage within a matter of months, even as the country
was just barely beginning to recover from the deep losses of World War I and
the Spanish flu. Everything was changing--except for racism, that remained very
entrenched.
I was particularly interested in exploring the choices that
the Turners could and couldn't make as women at that time. They could get jobs
outside the home, but only certain jobs, for instance as nurses, telephone
operators and secretaries. And much of society still considered that second
best to being a wife and mother; employment was something you had to endure if
you couldn't find a man to marry you. College was a complete long shot, even
for young women from wealthy families. And yet the concept of the New
Woman--smart, adventurous, unmarried--was gaining ground. I loved being able to
tell a story about four individual young women who were coming of age at the
same time America was coming of age.
This novel is the first book you've ever written using a first-person
perspective.
After having written in third person (my own "voice") for three
previous novels, it was quite a challenge to constantly have to think about how
a character would say something, whether she would or wouldn't notice
something, what her thoughts might be on a subject.
The story is told from the middle sisters' points of view. Why share only
two perspectives?
My original intention was to tell the story from one point of view--17-year-old
Winnie's--and I wrote the entire first draft in her voice. But then it became
clear there were interesting things happening with the other sisters that I
couldn't talk about because Winnie didn't know about them. I considered Kit
(the youngest) and Nell (the oldest), but ultimately it was Gert who had the
most secrets, and only she could bring them into full view. So I added chapters
from Gert and rewrote some of Winnie's chapters in Gert's voice.
The supporting cast--beyond the family dynamic--is rich and colorful.
Yes, many of the secondary characters stand for something important--both in
terms of the story and in terms of history.
As an African-American, Tippety Tap Jones is not only tapping across the stage,
he's tap dancing his way around the landmines of racism. He traverses the fine
line between deference (for his own survival) and not being pushed around. His
refusal to "black up" becomes a sort of rallying call for the girls,
and emboldens them to live on their own terms a little more, even though as
women, they are rarely allowed such control.
Nat and Benny, the Jewish comedy pair, are also stand-ins. The more I researched
vaudeville, the more I saw how immigrants and children of immigrants flooded to
vaudeville because it was one of the few ways they might get ahead in the new
world. Jewish humor was all over vaudeville, from Weber and Fields to Smith and
Dale to the Marx Brothers. The humor of Nat and Benny endears them to the
girls, and so does their avuncular kindness. They teach the girls many lessons
about entertainment and about life.
Acrobatics play a major role in the story. Do you have any personal
background in this?
Absolutely none. This became evident when my editor, a former gymnast, told me
quite bluntly that the girls would never have been able to learn all those
stunts in a couple of months. She really made me work at making the skill
acquisition more believable, for which I'm very grateful. Otherwise I'd be
getting scoffing reviews from gymnasts by the dozens.
What would you like readers to take away from this novel?
I hope that readers will love the story of these four girls. Then I hope
they'll consider the conditions and constraints the sisters had to deal
with--that all of these "outsiders" had to deal with. While we've
come so far from those days, to varying degrees and in different forms, some of
those conditions and constraints still exist. I hope The Tumbling
Turner Sisters will spark some conversations and deeper understanding
about that.
Is there another historical novel in your future?
Yes, I've just started a story set during the silent movie era of the early
1920s. Hollywood was becoming a mecca for film production and it was a pretty
crazy place, so I'm having a lot of fun!
Note: This interview is a reprint and is being posted with the permission of Shelf Awareness. To read this Q&A as originally published on Shelf Awareness (6/24/16), click HERE
